justifying global warming?? may be

Technology is my 2nd love, first being nature. I wondered if the two could live in complete harmony, not a marriage though. Marriage somehow can never be perceived as complete harmony by me. It amazes me to see how the fanatics of either world refused to see the miracles of the other.  How can you deny the interdependence, when you see NGOs using social media network to propagate. And how could you deny the raw material for technology was a part of nature once?
It’s like these people are indifferent to common sense.

But then, what if the global warming was meant to happen, like the dinosaurs were meant to disappear? what if nature is not as perfect as we believe? What if nature was inclined to making mistakes too?

‘Man is the biggest mistake of nature!’ we all crib, okay! all the ‘eco-friendly-s’ crib. But what if man was the one meant to fix things? And what if global warming was his weapon to do so?

None of us knows what is going to happen after when global warming reaches to its peak. After dinosaurs, was ice age and after that was this pristine new life.  How about a super technical alien life post global warming, for whom nature was more refined and raw materials were more processed.
Nature too I believe is perceptive. The perception of nature on earth differs from that on mars. Likewise can't the perception of nature change from that of today to probably 100 years from now?

So then are we supposed to stop battling against the fatal globalization and its impact on the environment? Are we NOT supposed to fight for MOTHER earth?


Sometimes I really do wish for this world to end. It excites me at times, the sound of ‘Funeral of the World’. The funeral of the world is already in procession. The pallbearers of earth are disguised as the harbingers of development.  Death is inevitable to everything that lives then why not earth? 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'creative brain and abstract person'

love is air

ambitions or craziness