justifying global warming?? may be
Technology
is my 2nd love, first being nature. I wondered if the two could live in
complete harmony, not a marriage though. Marriage somehow can never be perceived
as complete harmony by me. It amazes me to see how the fanatics of either world
refused to see the miracles of the other. How can you deny the
interdependence, when you see NGOs using social media network to propagate. And
how could you deny the raw material for technology was a part of nature once?
It’s
like these people are indifferent to common sense.

‘Man
is the biggest mistake of nature!’ we all crib, okay! all the ‘eco-friendly-s’
crib. But what if man was the one meant to fix things? And what if global
warming was his weapon to do so?
None
of us knows what is going to happen after when global warming reaches to its
peak. After dinosaurs, was ice age and after that was this pristine new life.
How about a super technical alien life post global warming, for whom
nature was more refined and raw materials were more processed.
Nature
too I believe is perceptive. The perception of nature on earth differs from
that on mars. Likewise can't the perception of nature change from that of today
to probably 100 years from now?
So
then are we supposed to stop battling against the fatal globalization and its
impact on the environment? Are we NOT supposed to fight for MOTHER earth?
Sometimes
I really do wish for this world to end. It excites me at times, the sound of ‘Funeral
of the World’. The
funeral of the world is already in procession. The pallbearers of earth are
disguised as the harbingers of development. Death is inevitable to
everything that lives then why not earth?
Comments
Post a Comment